Modi government’s first task was to appoint SIT headed by a retired Supreme Court judge, Sh MB Shah while former SC judge, Arijit Pasayat was appointed as Vice-Chairman. Revenue Secretary, Directors of CBI, IB, RAW and ED, the CBDT Chairman and an RBI deputy governor were officially asked to assist this SIT.
Seniority for CJI’s Appointment? TOI (Delhi Edition.DT.24 August 2014) carried a write up by Markandeya Katju J. Former Judge of Supreme Court of India and presently Chairman of Press Council of India wherein he says that for appointment to the office of Chief Justice of India, “Merit should be the criteria and not the seniority“. […]
A Letter to The Law Minister by Sh. A. K Srivastava, Sr Advocate, ,Supreme Court
Corruption in Judiciary; A post by Sh. AK Srivastava on corruption in courts
The Shameless Erring Judge is a post by Sh. AK Srivastava, Sr. Advocate Supreme Court has discussed pro-n-cons of recent reporting of sexual harassment of the Lady Justice of the same state.
My submission ,therefore, is that the Hon’ble Supreme Court ought to have given a fair chance to the Legislature to prove their innocence failing which they deserved disqualified.
The purpose of my writing this blog is two folds. Firstly, Judges duty is so delicate in judging the cause that a small deviation may pervert the law. Secondly,a Judge always walks on razor sharp path which causes injury to the entire legal system.
If Modi government shows it political will to arrest this Builder Mafia then & only then Modi may hope to march towards his goal of 2022. However there is little hope that any government will do anything against these Mafia because Builders Mafia Money is nothing but actually black money of Big-Big Government officers + Big & Small Politicians backed by Land Mafia group. We all know that “None cares for Campa Cola compound type cases”
Breaking news from DNA UPA and Builder Lobby eye NCR forest land of 500 hectares worth Rs 50,000 crore. Are we going to see another “Jija” type scam?
Author: Ak Srivastava “With respect to first of these arguments,I do not think S100 imposes on Parliament the duty to continue to provide Judges with precisely the same type of pension they received in 1867. The Canadian Constitution is not locked for ever in a 119 year old casket. It lives and breaths and is capable of growing […]