one must re-examine the traditions in modern reference and context. And if that tradition fails in modern concept, one must be ready to rectify or leave that tradition all together, even if that tradition is being followed be masses.
one must re-examine the traditions in modern reference and context. And if that tradition fails in modern concept, one must be ready to rectify or leave that tradition all together, even if that tradition is being followed be masses.
यह सही है कि किसी धर्म या सम्प्रदाय को आतंकवाद से जोड़ कर नहीं देखना चाहिए क्योंकि किसी भी धर्म या सम्प्रदाय के सभी व्यक्ति कभी भी आतंकवादी नहीं हो सकते. साथ ही यह भी सही है कि सभी आतंकवादी विदेश से नहीं आते. उनकी योजना चाहे विदेश में बनती हो, चाहे उनकी के संसाधन विदेश से आते हो परन्तु उनसे सहानभूति रखनेवाले, उनको सहायता देने वाले और उनकी तरफ से उनकी योजना को कार्यान्वित करने वाले इसी देश में रहते है. इस बात का प्रमाण इस देश में होनी वाली गिरफ्तारियों है. आखिर कोई यह क्यों नहीं बताता कि स्लीपर सेल क्या चीज़ है? कहाँ और किस देश के लोग स्लीपर सेल में शामिल होते है? जहाँ मीडिया और सेक्युलर वर्ग गुजरात में हुई शर्मनाक घटना तो उजागिर करने पर लगा है, वही क्या उसका कर्तव्य आतंकवाद और उससे सम्बंधित व्यक्तियों और गिरोह को उजागर करना नहीं है? अगर मीडिया और सेक्युलर वर्ग केवल संप्रदाय विशेष के प्रति होने वाले कतिपय अन्याय को ही उजागर करता रहेगा और समाज में फैलने वाले आतंकवाद के प्रति उदासीन रहेगा तो क्या यह ना माना जाए कि उसका ध्येय केवल और केवल राजनैतिक है और उसकी पूरी मुहीम केवल मोदी और बीजेपी विरोधी ही है?
It is universally true that no religion or group of particular persons should be attached with terrorist activities because all persons or maximum people of any religion can’t associate themselves with terrorism. Their conscious will never allow them to help or carry out terrorist activities. At the same time, it is also true, that all terrorists don’t come from foreign land. It is possible that all terror conspiracies are hatched outside of India, the required resources like money & weapons are sent by foreign conspirators, but one can’t deny the existence of terrorist’s helpers & sympathizers inside India. The recent arrests of terrorists & their helpers are amply proof of it. I always wonder that why don’t media & political-secular group enlighten people of India over “Sleeper Cells”? What are these sleeper cells & who are the people who work silently in these cells? For what they work for these cell? Do they work out of poverty & for money only or there is something else which gravitates their dedication towards these sleeper cells? Is it not media & secular group’s duty to expose such persons or group of persons? If media and these political-seculars go on talking about the injustice for a particular section but fails to expose the cancer of terrorism taking its root slowly but steadily then, I am sorry to say that, they would fail in their duty towards their mother-land. At the same time why should not their inaction, to arrest the fetal disease of terrorism, be labeled as only political opportunism? Why we, the people of India, should not presume that they have only one agenda and that is to bring down Modi and his government by all right & wrong methods?
Accept by heart that “Yes, It is Islamic Terror.” Once you accept it, solution would appear immediately. It is your call now.
Older Generation needs Social Security; I don’t mean that our offspring don’t want to keep us with them. It also does not mean that they don’t want to afford our day to day living & medical cost, nor it means that they don’t want to sit with their parents/grandparents. It simply means, changing scenario would not allow them to do all this as the please. The are always willing to do service to oldies but question is can they do it?
The Muslim community also needs to realize that the presence of different streaks and streams is a boon not bane. We need the soft liners, the hardliners and the moderates. Sometimes a soft line is effective; occasionally a hard-line does the trick but moderate approach delivers in most cases. However the work of moderates is made easy by the presence of hardliners and soft liners.
Secularism – A Different View: At a time when every kind of a politician is trying to give a new definition to Secularism, it is indeed a very difficult subject to discuss. Nonetheless, this is the most appropriate time to discuss it as it is a very relevant topic in the din of Election 2014.
Modi and Minorities s another thought provoking post by Sh. AK Srivastava, S. Advpcate Supreme Court where he dealt with this sensitive issue with maturity.