Narendra Modi and Godhara Riots

          
However, following allegations which was in the nature of criminal complicity’s were found to have not been substantiated ( Not Proved ):-
        
 1. The allegation that Sri Narendra Modi instructed the DGP and senior officers to allow mob to give vent to the Hindu anger on the minority Muslims in the wake of Godhra incident during the meeting held on 27.02.2002 evening in Gandhinagar was not substantiated.( NOT PROVED )                                             

2.The allegation that it was CM who decided that dead bodies of those killed in Godhara train fire be brought to Ahamdabad and paraded in the City was not substantiated ( NOT PROVED )                       

 3.The allegation that numerous illegal instructions given verbally (by the CM to official as detailed in third affidavit dated 09.04.2004 by P.B.  Dreekumar to the Nanavati Commission was not substantiated (NOT PROVED).
         
4. The allegation that no follow up action was taken (by the Gujarat Government/CM) on the reports sent by R.B. Ssreekumar on 24.04.2002, 15.06.2002, 20.08.2002 and 28.08.2002 about anti-minority stance of the Administration. Copies of these reports are appended in second Affidavit dated 06.10.2004 of R.B.Sriikumar to the nanavati Commission was not substantiated ( NOT PROVED ) 
        
 5. The allegation that a press statement was made by Shri Narendra Modi that the reaction against the Muslim community was the operation of Newton’s law of reaction was not substantiated ( NOT PROVED ) 
         
6. The allegation that there was undue delay in requisition and deployment of army, though anti-minority violence had broken out on 27.02.2002 afternoon itself in cities of Vadodara, Ahmedabad etc was not substantiated ( NOT PROVED ) 
 
 7. The allegation that the State Home Secretary Shri G.C. Murmu was presumably detailed for tutoring, cajoling and even intimidating officials deposing before the Nanavati commission so that they do not tell the truth and harm the interests of the CM and ruling party, as narrated in third Affidavit of Shri R.B.Sreekumar was not substantiated ( NOT PROVED ) 
         
8. The allegation that the fact that victims of nots and police firings were predominantly of the Muslim community, will establish that rioters, the administration, cohorts of the ruling party (BJP) were moving in collaboration for achieving the satanic objectives of the CM. Statistics in this regard are given in the second Affidavit dated 06.10.2004 (Para 3/Appendix V) of Sreekumar to the Nanavati Commission was not substantiated ( NOT PROVED ) 
           
In view of the finding recorded by it, the SIT filed an application before the Ld. Magistrate, Ahmedabad to close the case.
           
Smt. Zakia Jafari, filed a protest petition before the Court opposing closure of the case. The Ld. Magistrate heard the matter for several days. A battery of lawyers appeared for Smt. Zakia Jafari and argued the matter in detail. However, the learned Magistrate did not find any substance in their submission’s and was pleased to accept the report of the SIT, allowed the application of SIT for the closure of the case rejecting Smt. Zakia Jafari’s protest Petition by its order dated 26.12.2013.
           
Now it is for Smt. Zakia Jafari to either accept the Verdict or move the superior Court but the matter needs to be fought on judicial platform. No person from any platform much-less from the platform of a Press Conference show disrespect to the verdict of the Court till it is varied by the Judiciary.
          
The Prime Minister showed utmost contempt to the Judiciary when he said that Narendra Modi presided over the mass massacre of people in Ahmedabad disrespecting order of Court.
          
In my view, Dr. Manmohan Singh who is only a nominated Prime Minister on behalf of Smt. Sonia Gandhi could not have become the Prime Minister in ordinary course, has defaced and defiled the constitution and constitutional scheme and brought shame to the nation by becoming the Prime Minister in this manner. We lived with this kid ugly mechanism which surfaced for the first time in it constitutional highly. That apart, by his constant inaction and Prime Minister brought a complete halt to Indian economy. He inherited 8.4 GDP growth rate from NDA Govt. in May 2004 but brought it to half by the completion of his ten years of term, brought down Industrial Growth to nearly 0%, allowed inflation to run always high bringing an oppressive regine, earned a destination of heading a most corrupt Govt. in the independent India. In other words, he proved to be disastrous for the nation.
          
Now, when the nation is pinning its hope on Sri Narendra Modi to bring development and growth to the nation and thus bring solace to the people, he is being targeted unjustifiably only with a view to tarnish his image.
         
I hope, the nation teaches a lesson to UPA, never to be forgotten by them.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Disclaimer:  Yug Vani invites stories, comments, cartoons, jokes and any other information that would be of interest to general readers. We reserve the right to accept or refuse submissions and edit for content and length. We also reserve the right to refuse advertising that in our opinion does not reflect the standards of this website. The opinions expressed, whether by paid advertisement or editorial content does not necessarily reflect the views of this website. Content submitted may be reprinted and acknowledged without consent unless specifically requested.

Loading

AK Srivastava
Follow him
Latest posts by AK Srivastava (see all)